[Machine] That Umar ibn al-Khattab settled the blood money for the Jew and the Christian at four thousand, and for the Magian at eight hundred dirhams.  

أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ ؓ قَضَى فِي دِيَةِ الْيَهُودِيِّ وَالنَّصْرَانِيِّ بِأَرْبَعَةِ آلَافٍ وَفِي دِيَةِ الْمَجُوسِيِّ بِثَمَانِمِائَةِ دِرْهَمٍ  

[Machine] About Uthman ibn Affan, contrasting with him while there are two narrations, one of them is not preserved and the other is disconnected, which we have mentioned in a chapter that a believer is not to be killed by a disbeliever.  

عَنْ عُثْمَانَ بْنِ عَفَّانَ ؓ بِخِلَافِهِ وَهُوَ عَنْهُ بِإِسْنَادَيْنِ أَحَدُهُمَا غَيْرُ مَحْفُوظٍ وَالْآخَرُ مُنْقَطِعٌ قَدْ ذَكَرْنَاهُمَا فِي بَابِ لَا يُقْتَلُ مُؤْمِنٌ بِكَافِرٍ  

[Machine] "And Malik said to me the same thing."  

وَقَالَ لِي مَالِكٌ مِثْلَهُ  

[Machine] Ibn Mas'ud and another person used to say about the diya (blood money) of the Magian (Zoroastrian) that it is eight hundred dirhams. And this has been narrated from Ibn Lahi'ah with another chain of narration, attributed to him as a marfu' (elevated) statement.  

وَابْنَ مَسْعُودٍ ؓ كَانَا يَقُولَانِ فِي دِيَةِ الْمَجُوسِيِّ ثَمَانُمِائَةِ دِرْهَمٍ وَقَدْ رُوِيَ ذَلِكَ عَنِ ابْنِ لَهِيعَةَ بِإِسْنَادٍ آخَرَ لَهُ مَرْفُوعًا  

[Machine] The Messenger of Allah, ﷺ , said that the blood money of the Magus is 800 dirhams, as mentioned by Abu Salih, the scribe of Al-Layth. It is most likely that it should be preserved and Allah knows best.  

قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ دِيَةُ الْمَجُوسِيِّ ثَمَانُمِائَةِ دِرْهَمٍ تَفَرَّدَ بِهِ أَبُو صَالِحٍ كَاتِبُ اللَّيْثِ وَالْأَوَّلُ أَشْبَهُ أَنْ يَكُونَ مَحْفُوظًا وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ  

"The blood money for a disbeliever is half the blood money for the believer." (Hassan) (Using translation from Nasāʾī 4807)   

أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ قَالَ عَقْلُ الْكَافِرِ نِصْفُ عَقْلِ الْمُؤْمِنِ  

the Messenger of Allah ﷺ ruled that the blood money for the people of the book is half of that of the blood money for the Muslims, and they are the Jews and Christians. (Using translation from Ibn Mājah 2644)   

أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ قَالَ إِنَّ عَقْلَ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابَيْنِ نِصْفُ عَقْلِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ وَهُمُ الْيَهُودُ وَالنَّصَارَى  

[Machine] The value of the blood money during the time of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was 800 dinars or 8,000 dirhams. The blood money of the people of the Book at that time was half of the blood money of the Muslims. This remained the case until the caliphate of Umar (may Allah be pleased with him). He mentioned his sermon on raising the blood money when the prices of camels increased. He said, "He left the blood money of the people of the Dhimma (non-Muslims living under Islamic rule) without raising it, while he raised the blood money. It is possible that his statement 'half of the blood money of the Muslims' refers to 8,000 dirhams, so his blood money during the time of the Prophet ﷺ was 4,000 dirhams, and Umar did not raise it. His knowledge was that it was at the time of the People of the Book as a timing, and in the Islamic community as a calendar."  

كَانَتْ قِيمَةُ الدِّيَةِ عَلَى عَهْدِ رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ ثَمَانَمِائَةِ دِينَارٍ بِثَمَانِيَةِ آلَافِ دِرْهَمٍ وَدِيَةُ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ يَوْمَئِذٍ النِّصْفُ مِنْ دِيَةِ الْمُسْلِمِينَ قَالَ فَكَانَ ذَلِكَ كَذَلِكَ حَتَّى اسْتُخْلِفَ عُمَرُ ؓ فَذَكَرَ خُطْبَتَهُ فِي رَفْعِ الدِّيَةِ حِينَ غَلَتِ الْإِبِلِ قَالَ وَتَرَكَ دِيَةَ أَهْلِ الذِّمَّةِ لَمْ يَرْفَعْهَا فِيمَا رَفَعَ مِنَ الدِّيَةِ فَيُحْتَمَلُ أَنْ يَكُونَ وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ قَوْلُهُ عَلَى النِّصْفِ مِنْ دِيَةِ الْمُسْلِمِ رَاجِعًا إِلَى ثَمَانِيَةِ آلَافِ دِرْهَمٍ فَتَكُونَ دِيَتُهُ فِي عَهْدِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ أَرْبَعَةَ آلَافِ دِرْهَمٍ فَلَمْ يَرْفَعْهَا عُمَرُ ؓ فِيمَا رَفَعَ مِنَ الدِّيَةِ عِلْمًا مِنْهُ بِأَنَّهَا فِي أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ تَوْقِيتٌ وَفِي أَهْلِ الْإِسْلَامِ تَقْوِيمٌ  

[Machine] That the Messenger of Allah ﷺ required every Muslim to kill a man from the People of the Book four thousand times.  

أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ فَرَضَ عَلَى كُلِّ مُسْلِمٍ قَتَلَ رَجُلًا مِنْ أَهْلِ الْكِتَابِ أَرْبَعَةَ آلَافٍ  

[Machine] The Messenger of Allah (may ﷺ ) made the blood money for the two Amiri men be the same blood money for a free Muslim man, and there was a covenant between them.  

جَعَلَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ دِيَةَ الْعَامِرِيَّيْنِ دِيَةَ الْحُرِّ الْمُسْلِمِ وَكَانَ لَهُمَا عَهْدٌ  

[Machine] He said that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ made the compensation for the people of treaties equal to the compensation for Muslims. So Abu Sa'd, Sa'id son of Al-Marzban Al-Baqqal, is not used as evidence. Then his apparent statement necessitates it to be like the hadith of 'Amr ibn Shu'aib, and Allah knows best.  

أَنَّهُ قَالَ جَعَلَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ دِيَةَ الْمُعَاهَدِينَ دِيَةَ الْمُسْلِمِ فَأَبُو سَعْدٍ هَذَا سَعِيدُ بْنُ الْمَرْزُبَانِ الْبَقَّالُ لَا يُحْتَجُّ بِهِ ثُمَّ ظَاهِرُهُ يُوجِبُ أَنْ يَكُونَ كَحَدِيثِ عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ  

[Machine] And the Messenger of Allah ﷺ loved two men from the polytheists who were involved with him during the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah. Abu Abdullah Al-Hafiz informed us, narrating from Ali ibn Hamshath, narrating from Muhammad ibn Al-Mughirah, narrating from Al-Qasim ibn Al-Hakam Al-Urani, narrating from Al-Hasan ibn Umarah, who mentioned it. And Al-Hasan ibn Umarah is considered unreliable and cannot be used as evidence.  

وَدَى رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ رَجُلَيْنِ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ وَكَانَا مِنْهُ فِي عَهْدٍ دِيَةَ الْحُرَّيْنِ الْمُسْلِمَيْنِ أَخْبَرْنَاهُ أَبُو عَبْدِ اللهِ الْحَافِظُ ثنا عَلِيُّ بْنُ حَمْشَاذٍ ثنا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْمُغِيرَةِ ثنا الْقَاسِمُ بْنُ الْحَكَمِ الْعُرَنِيُّ ثنا الْحَسَنُ بْنُ عُمَارَةَ فَذَكَرَهُ وَالْحَسَنُ بْنُ عُمَارَةَ مَتْرُوكٌ لَا يُحْتَجُّ بِهِ  

[Machine] The Prophet ﷺ said that the blood money of a non-Muslim is equivalent to the blood money of a Muslim. And it was also said about Ali ibn al-Jaad that he paid the blood money of a non-Muslim to the family of a Muslim. Abu Abdur Rahman as-Sulami and Abu Bakr ibn al-Harith reported that Abu al-Hasan Ali ibn Umar ad-Daraqutni, the Hafiz, Abu Kurz, said that this hadith is rejected and not supported by other narrators except for Nafi'. He also said that his name is Abdullah ibn Abdul Malik al-Fihri.  

أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ قَالَ دِيَةُ ذَمِّيٍّ دِيَةُ مُسْلِمٍ وَقَالَ غَيْرُهُ عَنْ عَلِيِّ بْنِ الْجَعْدِ وََدَى ذِمِّيًّا دِيَةَ مُسْلِمٍ 16353 فَأَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ السُّلَمِيُّ وَأَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ الْحَارِثِ قَالَا قَالَ أَبُو الْحَسَنِ عَلِيُّ بْنُ عُمَرَ الدَّارَقُطْنِيُّ الْحَافِظُ أَبُو كُرْزٍ هَذَا مَتْرُوكُ الْحَدِيثِ وَلَمْ يَرْوِهِ عَنْ نَافِعٍ غَيْرُهُ قَالَ وَاسْمُهُ عَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ الْفِهْرِيُّ  

[Machine] The Jews and the Christians during the time of the Prophet ﷺ are like the blood money for Muslims, and Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman. When Muawiyah came, he gave half of the blood money to the family of the slain person and threw the other half into the public treasury. Omar ibn Abdul Aziz made a ruling on the half that was thrown away and returned it. Imam Shafi'i rejected this ruling, stating that it was sent as a gift, and that Al-Zuhri disapproved of this kind of gift. We narrate from Umar and Uthman what is more authentic than it, and Allah knows best.  

الْيَهُودِيِّ وَالنَّصْرَانِيِّ فِي زَمَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ مِثْلَ دِيَةِ الْمُسْلِمِ وَأَبِي بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرَ وَعُثْمَانَ ؓ فَلَمَّا كَانَ مُعَاوِيَةُ أَعْطَى أَهْلَ الْمَقْتُولِ النِّصْفَ وَأَلْقَى النِّصْفَ فِي بَيْتِ الْمَالِ قَالَ ثُمَّ قَضَى عُمَرُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ فِي النِّصْفِ وَأَلْقَى مَا كَانَ جَعَلَ مُعَاوِيَةُ فَقَدْ رَدَّهُ الشَّافِعِيُّ بِكَوْنِهِ مُرْسَلًا وَبِأَنَّ الزُّهْرِيَّ قَبِيحُ الْمُرْسَلِ وَأَنَّا رُوِّينَا عَنْ عُمَرَ وَعُثْمَانَ ؓ مَا هُوَ أَصَحُّ مِنْهُ وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ  

[Machine] Whoever has a covenant or treaty, his ransom shall be the ransom of the Muslim. This is non-negotiable and non-transferable.  

مَنْ كَانَ لَهُ عَهْدٌ أَوْ ذِمَّةٌ فَدِيَتُهُ دِيَةُ الْمُسْلِمِ هَذَا مُنْقَطِعٌ وَمَوْقُوفٌ