[Machine] "About Abdullah, may Allah be pleased with him."  

عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ ؓ  

[Machine] About Abdullah regarding the compensation for a mistake, it is a fifth. A fifth for the sons of Makhdad, a fifth for the daughters of Makhdad, a fifth for the daughters of Laboon, a fifth for the Hijaaq, and a fifth for the Jizaa. This is what is known from Abdullah ibn Masood with these chains of narration and some of our scholars narrated it, including Sheikh Abu Al-Hasan Ad-Daraqutni, these chains of narration from Abdullah, and he placed the sons of Makhdad in the place of the sons of Laboon, which is a mistake on his part. I have also seen it in the book of Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzaymah, who is an Imam in the narration of Wakee from Sufyan with his two chains, and the same for the sons of Laboon, and in the narration of Sa'id ibn Bashir from Qatadah from Abu Mijlaz from Abu Ubaidah from Ibn Masood, the same for the sons of Laboon, and it was narrated from the hadith of Yahya, meaning Ibn Abi Zaidah, from his father and others from Abu Ishaq from Alqamah from Ibn Masood, the sons of Makhdad. If what they narrated is preserved, it is what we lean towards. The narrations about Ibn Masood in this regard are conflicting, and the opinion of Abdullah is well-known among the sons of Makhdad. Abu Bakr ibn Mundhir chose this opinion and he argued that Imam Shafi'i, may Allah have mercy on him, only followed the opinion of the people of Medina regarding the compensation for a mistake because people have differed on this issue, and the Sunnah from the Prophet ﷺ stipulates a hundred camels without specifying the age of the camels, and the term "camels" includes both young and adult ones, so he bound the killer to the least of what they said. And it seems that he did not hear the statement of Abdullah ibn Masood because we found the statement of Abdullah to be less than what was said in terms of compensation, because the sons of Makhdad are fewer than the sons of Laboon and "camels" is a term that includes it, so that is what is obligatory without exceeding it, and it is the statement of a companion, so it is more deserving than others. And success is from Allah, and the hadith of Ibn Masood has been narrated from another perspective in a raised form, but its elevation is not valid.  

عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ فِي دِيَةِ الْخَطَأِ أَخْمَاسٌ خُمُسٌ بَنُو مَخَاضٍ وَخُمُسٌ بَنَاتُ مَخَاضٍ وَخُمُسٌ بَنَاتُ لَبُونٍ وَخُمُسٌ حِقَاقٌ وَخُمُسٌ جِذَاعٌ هَذَا هُوَ الْمَعْرُوفُ عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ مَسْعُودٍ بِهَذِهِ الْأَسَانِيدِ وَقَدْ رَوَى بَعْضُ حُفَّاظِنَا وَهُوَ الشَّيْخُ أَبُو الْحَسَنِ الدَّارَقُطْنِيُّ هَذِهِ الْأَسَانِيدَ عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ وَجَعَلَ مَكَانَ بَنِي الْمَخَاضِ بَنِي اللَّبُونِ وَهُوَ غَلَطٌ مِنْهُ وَقَدْ رَأَيْتُهُ أَيْضًا فِي كِتَابِ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ بْنِ خُزَيْمَةَ وَهُوَ إِمَامٌ فِي رِوَايَةِ وَكِيعٍ عَنْ سُفْيَانَ بِإِسْنَادَيْهِ كَذَلِكَ بَنِي لَبُونٍ وَفِي رِوَايَةِ سَعِيدِ بْنِ بَشِيرٍ عَنْ قَتَادَةَ عَنْ أَبِي مِجْلَزٍ عَنْ أَبِي عُبَيْدَةَ عَنِ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ كَذَلِكَ بَنِي لَبُونٍ وَرَوَاهُ مِنْ حَدِيثِ يَحْيَى يَعْنِي ابْنَ أَبِي زَائِدَةَ عَنْ أَبِيهِ وَغَيْرِهِ عَنْ أَبِي إِسْحَاقَ عَنْ عَلْقَمَةَ عَنِ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ بَنِي مَخَاضٍ فَإِنْ كَانَ مَا رَوَيَاهُ مَحْفُوظًا فَهُوَ الَّذِي نَمِيلُ إِلَيْهِ وَصَارَتِ الرِّوَايَاتُ فِيهِ عَنِ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ مُتَعَارِضَةً وَمَذْهَبُ عَبْدِ اللهِ مَشْهُورٌ فِي بَنِي الْمَخَاضِ وَقَدِ اخْتَارَ أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ الْمُنْذِرِ فِي هَذَا مَذْهَبَهُ وَاحْتَجَّ بِأَنَّ الشَّافِعِيَّ رَحِمَهُ اللهُ إِنَّمَا صَارَ إِلَى قَوْلِ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ فِي دِيَةِ الْخَطَأِ؛ لِأَنَّ النَّاسَ قَدِ اخْتَلَفُوا فِيهَا وَالسُّنَّةُ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ وَرَدَتْ مُطْلَقَةً بِمِائَةٍ مِنَ الْإِبِلِ غَيْرَ مُفَسَّرَةٍ وَاسْمُ الْإِبِلِ يَتَنَاوَلُ الصِّغَارَ وَالْكِبَارَ فَأَلْزَمَ الْقَاتِلَ أَقَلَّ مَا قَالُوا إِنَّهُ يَلْزَمُهُ فَكَانَ عِنْدَهُ قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ أَقَلَّ مَا قِيلَ فِيهَا وَكَأَنَّهُ لَمْ يَبْلُغْهُ قَوْلُ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ مَسْعُودٍ فَوَجَدْنَا قَوْلَ عَبْدِ اللهِ أَقَلَّ مَا قِيلَ فِيهَا؛ لِأَنَّ بَنِي الْمَخَاضِ أَقَلُّ مِنْ بَنِي اللَّبُونِ وَاسْمُ الْإِبِلِ يَتَنَاوَلُهُ فَكَانَ هُوَ الْوَاجِبَ دُونَ مَا زَادَ عَلَيْهِ وَهُوَ قَوْلُ صَحَابِيٍّ فَهُوَ أَوْلَى مِنْ غَيْرِهِ وَبِاللهِ التَّوْفِيقُ وَقَدْ رُوِيَ حَدِيثُ ابْنُ مَسْعُودٍ مِنْ وَجْهٍ آخَرَ مَرْفُوعًا وَلَا يَصِحُّ رَفْعُهُ  

[Machine] That the Messenger of Allah, ﷺ , made the compensation for unintentional killing five times, and it did not increase beyond this.  

أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ جَعَلَ الدِّيَةَ فِي الْخَطَأِ أَخْمَاسًا لَمْ يَزِدْ عَلَى هَذَا  

[Machine] The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said concerning the blood money for accidental killing, "Twenty she-camels, twenty she-goats, twenty female camels that have given birth, twenty female sheep, and twenty she-camels that have given birth." Abu Dawood said that this is the statement of Abdullah, meaning that it was narrated from him as a statement that is attributed to him but not directly attributed to the Prophet ﷺ. Abu Abdur-Rahman As-Sulami and Abu Bakr ibn Al-Harith Al-Faqeeh reported that Abu Al-Hasan Ad-Daraqutni, the Hafiz, stated in explaining this hadith, "We do not know."  

قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ ﷺ فِي دِيَةِ الْخَطَأِ عِشْرُونَ حِقَّةً وَعِشْرُونَ جَذَعَةً وَعِشْرُونَ ابْنَةَ مَخَاضٍ وَعِشْرُونَ ابْنَةَ لَبُونٍ وَعِشْرُونَ ابْنَ مَخَاضٍ ذُكُرٌ قَالَ أَبُو دَاوُدَ وَهُوَ قَوْلُ عَبْدِ اللهِ يَعْنِي إِنَّمَا رُوِيَ مِنْ قَوْلِ عَبْدِ اللهِ مَوْقُوفًا غَيْرَ مَرْفُوعٍ 16161 أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ السُّلَمِيُّ وَأَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ الْحَارِثِ الْفَقِيهُ قَالَا قَالَ أَبُو الْحَسَنِ الدَّارَقُطْنِيُّ الْحَافِظُ فِي تَعْلِيلِ هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ لَا نَعْلَمُ