[Machine] Everything that money allows is not necessarily permissible.  

كُلُّ شَيْءٍ أَجَازَهُ الْمَالُ فَلَيْسَ بِطَلَاقٍ  

[Machine] "So it is what you have named, and it was narrated in it a musnad hadith whose chain of transmission has not been verified, and it was narrated in it from Ali and Ibn Mas'ood. Ibn Al-Mundhir said that Ahmad, meaning Ibn Hanbal, weakened the hadith of Uthman and the hadith of Ali and Ibn Mas'ood. In their chain of transmission, there is a disagreement, and the hadith of Ibn Abbas that Tawus intended is more authentic than it in this matter."  

فَهُوَ مَا سَمَّيْتَ وَقَدْ رُوِيَ فِيهِ حَدِيثٌ مُسْنَدٌ لَمْ يَثْبُتْ إِسْنَادُهُ وَرُوِيَ فِيهِ عَنْ عَلِيٍّ وَابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ ؓ قَالَ ابْنُ الْمُنْذِرِ وَضَعَّفَ أَحْمَدُ يَعْنِي ابْنَ حَنْبَلٍ حَدِيثَ عُثْمَانَ وَحَدِيثُ عَلِيٍّ وَابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ ؓ فِي إِسْنَادِهِمَا مَقَالٌ وَلَيْسَ فِي الْبَابِ أَصَحُّ مِنْ حَدِيثِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ يُرِيدُ حَدِيثَ طَاوُسٍ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ؓ  

[Machine] The Prophet ﷺ made "khul'" a clear divorce that 'Abbad bin Kathir al-Basri distinguished himself with. Ahmad bin Hanbal, Yahya bin Ma'in, al-Bukhari, and Shu'bah bin al-Hajjaj spoke about it, and how it is valid. This is in opposition to the opinion of Ibn 'Abbas and 'Ikrimah, who considered it possible that the intended meaning is divorce when it is intended or mentioned. The purpose of it is to cut off the possibility of return, and Allah knows best.  

النَّبِيَّ ﷺ جَعَلَ الْخُلْعَ تَطْلِيقَةً بَائِنَةً تَفَرَّدَ بِهِ عَبَّادُ بْنُ كَثِيرٍ الْبَصْرِيُّ وَقَدْ ضَعَّفَهُ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ حَنْبَلٍ وَيَحْيَى بْنُ مَعِينٍ وَالْبُخَارِيُّ وَتَكَلَّمَ فِيهِ شُعْبَةُ بْنُ الْحَجَّاجِ وَكَيْفَ يَصِحُّ ذَلِكَ وَمَذْهَبُ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ وَعِكْرِمَةَ بِخِلَافِهِ عَلَى أَنَّهُ يَحْتَمِلُ أَنْ يَكُونَ الْمُرَادُ بِهِ إِذَا نَوَى بِهِ طَلَاقًا أَوْ ذَكَرَهُ وَالْمَقْصُودُ مِنْهُ قَطْعُ الرَّجْعَةِ وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ