[Machine] "The child does not belong to the father or the mother, rather it is attributed to its lineage. Whoever says, 'I have written a book for him in which there is the testimony of Abdur-Rahman ibn Auf and Zaid ibn Thabit,' and another man, when Abd al-Malik was appointed as a ruler, they disputed whether it should be referred to Hisham ibn Isma'il or Isma'il ibn Hisham. They raised the matter to Abd al-Malik and he said, 'This is from the legal judgment that I did not see.' He ruled for us according to the book of Umar ibn al-Khattab, and we have been following it until now.' The Sheikh, may Allah have mercy on him, said this in this narration, and we have also narrated from Sa'id ibn al-Musayyib, from Umar ibn al-Khattab, and Uthman ibn Affan, for they said that the allegiance goes to the elder and the narrator from Ibn al-Musayyib, from Umar is more authentic than the narration of Amr ibn Shuayb. As for the hadith that is mentioned, it does not contain the statement of the Prophet ﷺ regarding allegiance."  

ﷺ مَا أَحْرَزَ الْوَلَدُ أَوِ الْوَالِدُ فَهُوَ لِعَصَبَتِهِ مَنْ كَانَ قَالَ فَكَتَبْتُ لَهُ كِتَابًا فِيهِ شَهَادَةُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ عَوْفٍ وَزَيْدِ بْنِ ثَابِتٍ ؓ وَرَجُلٍ آخَرَ فَلَمَّا اسْتُخْلِفَ عَبْدُ الْمَلِكِ اخْتَصَمُوا إِلَى هِشَامِ بْنِ إِسْمَاعِيلَ أَوْ إِلَى إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ هِشَامٍ فَرَفَعَهُمْ إِلَى عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ فَقَالَ هَذَا مِنَ الْقَضَاءِ الَّذِي مَا كُنْتُ أَرَاهُ قَالَ فَقَضَى لَنَا بِكِتَابِ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ ؓ فَنَحْنُ فِيهِ إِلَى السَّاعَةِ قَالَ الشَّيْخُ رَحِمَهُ اللهُ كَذَا فِي هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَةِ وَقَدْ رُوِّينَا عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ الْمُسَيِّبِ عَنْ عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ وَعُثْمَانَ بْنِ عَفَّانَ ؓ فَإِنَّهُمَا قَالَا الْوَلَاءُ لِلْكُبْرِ وَمُرْسَلُ ابْنِ الْمُسَيِّبِ عَنْ عُمَرَ ؓ أَصَحُّ مِنْ رِوَايَةِ عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ وَأَمَّا الْحَدِيثُ الْمَرْفُوعُ فِيهِ فَلَيْسَ فِيهِ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ﷺ قَالَ ذَلِكَ فِي الْوَلَاءِ  

[Machine] I heard Ali say that al-walā' is a branch of lineage. So whoever preserves the inheritance has preserved al-walā' as well. I found it in this narration, but it is incorrect. It seems that Yazid incorporates the narration of Thawri over the narration of Shurayk, and it contains confusion or he himself is confused. So, anyone other than him...  

سَمِعْتُ عَلِيًّا ؓ يَقُولُ الْوَلَاءُ شُعْبَةٌ مِنَ النَّسَبِ فَمَنْ أَحْرَزَ الْمِيرَاثَ فَقَدْ أَحْرَزَ الْوَلَاءَ كَذَا وَجَدْتُهُ فِي هَذِهِ الرِّوَايَةِ وَهُوَ خَطَأٌ وَكَأَنَّ يَزِيدَ حَمَلَ رِوَايَةَ الثَّوْرِيِّ عَلَى رِوَايَةِ شَرِيكٍ وَشَرِيكٌ وَهِمَ فِيهِ أَوْ وَهِمَ فِيهِ يَزِيدُ فَمَنْ دُونَهُ  

[Machine] Ali is a branch of the tribe of Al-Riqq. Whoever attains loyalty attains inheritance. This is the correct (answer), and so it is.  

عَلِيٌّ ؓ الْوَلَاءُ شُعْبَةٌ مِنَ الرِّقِّ مَنْ أَحْرَزَ الْوَلَاءَ أَحْرَزَ الْمِيرَاثَ هَذَا هُوَ الصَّحِيحُ وَكَذَلِكَ  

[Machine] Indeed, the one who inherits and is the only one to receive all the inheritance is the one who takes precedence over those who have obligations. And Allah knows best.  

أَنَّ الَّذِي يَحُوزُ الْمِيرَاثَ وَهُوَ الْعَصَبَةُ الَّذِي يَأْخُذُ جَمِيعَ الْمِيرَاثِ هُوَ الَّذِي يَأْخُذُ بِالْوَلَاءِ دُونَ أَصْحَابِ الْفُرُوضِ وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ  

[Machine] Abdullah died after Aisha, so his son inherited what his father had inherited from loyalty, and whoever mentioned loyalty to the elders made it for Qasim ibn Muhammad. It has been reported that Qasim denied that to Ibn Zubayr.  

عَبْدَ اللهِ مَاتَ بَعْدَ عَائِشَةَ فَأَحْرَزَ ابْنُهُ مَا كَانَ أَحْرَزَ أَبُوهُ مِنَ الْوَلَاءِ وَمَنْ قَالَ الْوَلَاءُ لِلْكُبْرِ جَعَلَهُ لِلْقَاسِمِ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ وَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنِ الْقَاسِمِ أَنَّهُ أَنْكَرَ ذَلِكَ عَلَى ابْنِ الزُّبَيْرِ  

[Machine] Ataa, may Allah have mercy on him, considered that as a flaw for Ibn Zubair, may Allah have mercy on them.  

عَطَاءٌ رَحِمَهُ اللهُ تَعَالَى فَعِيبَ ذَلِكَ عَلَى ابْنِ الزُّبَيْرِ رَحِمَهُمُ اللهُ تَعَالَى