Caution: Translations of Quran and Ḥadīth may lead to possible misapplications and misinterpretations. This site is intended for students of sacred knowledge that are proficient in comprehending classical Arabic and have a strong foundation in Islamic sciences. Also note that religious injunctions rely on several aspects beyond what one may glean through reading individual aḥādīth.
Qurʾān Bukhārī Muslim Nasāʾī Abū Dāwūd Tirmidhī Ibn Mājah Mālik Aḥmad Dārimī Ḥākim Ibn Ḥibbān Ṭabarānī Nasāʾī's Kubrá Bayhaqī al-Adab al-Mufrad al-Luʾluʾ wa-al-Marjān Ibn Rajab's Fifty Riyāḍ al-Ṣāliḥīn Aḥmad's Zuhd Suyūṭī Misc
hakim:5857 – Abū al-ʿAbbās Muḥammad b. Yaʿqūb > al-Ḥasan b. ʿAlī b. ʿAffān > Abū Usāmah > Ismāʿīl b. Abū Khālid > Qays b. Abū Ḥāzim > Saʿīd b. Zayd b. ʿAmr b. Nufayl > Laqad Raʾaytunī > ʿUmar Lamūthiqī And ʾUmmī / Um Saʿīd b. Zayd Yurīdunī > al-Islām Walaw

[Machine] "If someone refused or rejected, then it would be true in what you have done to Uthman according to the condition of the two sheikhs (referring to Abu Bakr and Umar), and they did not expel him according to the condition of Bukhari and Muslim."  

الحاكم:٥٨٥٧ – حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ ثَنَا الْحَسَنُ بْنُ عَلِيِّ بْنِ عَفَّانَ ثَنَا أَبُو أُسَامَةَ عَنْ إِسْمَاعِيلَ بْنِ أَبِي خَالِدٍ عَنْ قَيْسِ بْنِ أَبِي حَازِمٍ عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ زَيْدِ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ نُفَيْلٍ قَالَ «لَقَدْ رَأَيْتُنِي وَأَنَّ عُمَرَ لَمُوثِقِي وَأُمِّي يَعْنِي أُمَّ سَعِيدِ بْنِ زَيْدٍ يُرِيدُنِي عَلَى الْإِسْلَامِ وَلَوْ

أَنَّ أَحَدًا انْفَضَّ أَوِ ارْفَضَّ لَكَانَ حَقِيقًا بِمَا فَعَلْتُمْ بِعُثْمَانَ صَحِيحٌ عَلَى شَرْطِ الشَّيْخَيْنِ وَلَمْ يُخَرِّجَاهُ على شرط البخاري ومسلم  

Add your own reflection below:

Sign in with Google to add or reply to reflections.

See similar narrations below:

Collected by Ḥākim
hakim:3976 – Abū ʿAbdullāh al-Ṣaffār > Aḥmad b. Mihrān > Abū Nuʿaym > Sufyān > Ḥabīb b. Abū Thābit > Saʿīd b. Jubayr > Ibn ʿAbbās

[Machine] The phrase "الْمَاعُونُ الْعَارِيَةُ" is correct according to the conditions of the two famous scholars (i.e., the two sheikhs), but it is not mentioned in the conditions of Bukhari and Muslim.  

الحاكم:٣٩٧٦ – أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو عَبْدِ اللَّهِ الصَّفَّارُ ثنا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مِهْرَانَ ثنا أَبُو نُعَيْمٍ ثنا سُفْيَانُ عَنْ حَبِيبِ بْنِ أَبِي ثَابِتٍ عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ جُبَيْرٍ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ قَالَ

«الْمَاعُونُ الْعَارِيَةُ» صَحِيحٌ عَلَى شَرْطِ الشَّيْخَيْنِ وَلَمْ يُخَرِّجَاهُ على شرط البخاري ومسلم  

hakim:3893 – ʿAbd al-Raḥman b. al-Ḥasan al-Qāḍī > Ibrāhīm b. al-Ḥusayn > Ādam b. Abū Iyās > And Rqāʾ > Ibn Abū Najīḥ > Mujāhid > Ibn ʿAbbās Wa-al-Nnāziʿāt Gharq Wa-al-Nnāshiṭāt Nashṭ al-Nāzʿāt 2

[Machine] "Al-Mawt" is valid according to the condition of the two sheikhs (Al-Bukhari and Muslim), but it does not meet the condition of Al-Bukhari and Muslim.  

الحاكم:٣٨٩٣ – أَخْبَرَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ الْحَسَنِ الْقَاضِي ثنا إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ الْحُسَيْنِ ثنا آدَمُ بْنُ أَبِي إِيَاسٍ ثنا وَرْقَاءُ عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي نَجِيحٍ عَنْ مُجَاهِدٍ عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ {وَالنَّازِعَاتِ غَرْقًا وَالنَّاشِطَاتِ نَشْطًا} [النازعات 2] قَالَ

«الْمَوْتُ» صَحِيحٌ عَلَى شَرْطِ الشَّيْخَيْنِ وَلَمْ يُخَرِّجَاهُ على شرط البخاري ومسلم