[Machine] Then he took a handful and washed his right foot, and he took another handful and washed his left foot. These narrations have agreed that he washed both of them, and the narration of Ad-Darawardi suggests that he may have washed them in his sandals. Hisham Ibn Sa'd is not a very reliable narrator, so what contradicts the authentic sources cannot be accepted from him. How can he be the one countering the consensus when they are many, and he is just one? Ath-Thawri and Hisham Ibn Sa'd have also narrated from Zaid Ibn Aslam.  

ثُمَّ أَخَذَ حَفْنَةً فَغَسَلَ بِهَا رِجْلَهُ الْيُمْنَى وَأَخَذَ حَفْنَةً فَغَسَلَ رِجْلَهُ الْيُسْرَى فَهَذِهِ الرِّوَايَاتُ اتَّفَقَتْ عَلَى أَنَّهُ غَسَلَهُمَا وَحَدِيثُ الدَّرَاوَرْدِيِّ يَحْتَمِلُ أَنْ يَكُونَ مُوَافِقًا بِأَنْ يَكُونَ غَسَلَهُمَا فِي النَّعْلِ وَهِشَامُ بْنُ سَعْدٍ لَيْسَ بِالْحَافِظِ جِدًّا فَلَا يُقْبَلُ مِنْهُ مَا يُخَالِفُ فِيهِ الثِّقَاتِ الْأَثْبَاتَ كَيْفَ وَهُمْ عَدَدٌ وَهُوَ وَاحِدٌ؟ ‍ وَقَدْ رَوَى الثَّوْرِيُّ وَهِشَامُ بْنُ سَعْدٍ عَنْ زَيْدِ بْنِ أَسْلَمَ