[Machine] Abu Ubaid said: "A divorce cell is the one in which a person intends to divorce a camel, then he removes the halter from it and leaves it. It is a divorced cell because it has been divorced from the halter. It is divorced because it has been divorced from it. So if a man intends that, then it is considered that he has divorced her, but Umar dropped divorce from him due to his intention. And this is the basis for anyone who speaks about something that resembles the word divorce while intending something other than it. His statement is about what is between him and Allah, and in the judgment of interpreting Umar's opinion, the Shaykh said: "The order is based on what was interpreted from his statement about the divorced cell. As for his statement divorces, it is the same as divorce, so his statement is not accepted in the judgment. But Umar, it is possible that he dropped it from him because he said divorced cell but did not send the divorce to her and did not address her with it, so divorce did not occur on her. And Allah knows best.  

أَبُو عُبَيْدٍ قَوْلِهِ خَلِيَّةٌ طَالِقٌ أَرَادَ النَّاقَةَ تَكُونُ مَعْقُولَةً ثُمَّ تُطْلَقُ مِنْ عِقَالِهَا وَيُخَلَّى عَنْهَا فَهِيَ خَلِيَّةٌ مِنَ الْعِقَالِ وَهِيَ طَالِقٌ لِأَنَّهَا قَدْ طُلِّقَتْ مِنْهُ فَأَرَادَ الرَّجُلُ ذَلِكَ فَأَسْقَطَ عُمَرُ عَنْهُ الطَّلَاقَ لِنِيَّتِهِ وَهَذَا أَصْلٌ لِكُلِّ مَنْ تَكَلَّمَ بِشَيْءٍ يُشْبِهُ لَفْظَ الطَّلَاقِ وَهُوَ يَنْوِي غَيْرَهُ أَنَّ الْقَوْلَ قَوْلُهُ فِيمَا بَيْنَهُ وَبَيْنَ اللهِ تَعَالَى وَفِي الْحُكْمِ عَلَى تَأْوِيلِ مَذْهَبِ عُمَرَ ؓ قَالَ الشَّيْخُ الْأَمْرُ عَلَى مَا فُسِّرَ فِي قَوْلِهِ خَلِيَّةٌ فَأَمَّا قَوْلُهُ طَالِقٌ فَهُوَ نَفْسُ الطَّلَاقِ فَلَا يُقْبَلُ قَوْلُهُ فِيهِ فِي الْحُكْمِ لَكِنَّ عُمَرَ ؓ يُحْتَمَلُ أَنَّهُ إِنَّمَا أَسْقَطَهُ عَنْهُ لِأَنَّهُ كَانَ قَالَ خَلِيَّةٌ طَالِقٌ لَمْ يُرْسِلِ الطَّلَاقَ نَحْوَهَا وَلَمْ يُخَاطِبْهَا بِهِ فَلَمْ يَقَعْ بِهِ عَلَيْهَا الطَّلَاقُ وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ