[Machine] When the Prophet ﷺ went out to Hunayn, he mentioned and said in the takbeer at the beginning of the adhan four times. He also taught me the ikamah twice. Allah is the greatest, Allah is the greatest. I bear witness that there is no god but Allah, I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah. Come to prayer, come to success. Prayer has begun, prayer has begun. Allah is the greatest, Allah is the greatest. There is no god but Allah. He mentioned the ikamah separately, as you can see, and his statement was mentioned twice, referring to the word "ikamah." This is also indicated by the narration of Abdul-Razzaq from Ibn Jurayj in 1972, Abu Bakr ibn Ali al-Hafiz informed us, Abu Ishaq Ibrahim ibn Abdullah narrated to us, Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzaimeh narrated to us, Muhammad ibn Rafea narrated to us, Abdul-Razzaq informed us, Ibn Jurayj narrated to us, Uthman ibn al-Sa'ib, their master, narrated to us from his father, the sheikh of Abu Mahdhurah, and from Umm Abd al-Malik ibn Abu Mahdhurah, that they heard that from Abu Mahdhurah. So he mentioned the hadith similar to the hadith of Hajjaj, and he said at the end, "If you perform the prayer, say it twice. Prayer has begun, prayer has begun. Did you hear?" And he added that Abu Mahdhurah would not separate his fingers, nor would he move them apart, because the Messenger of Allah ﷺ wiped over them. Abu Bakr ibn Ali al-Hafiz informed us, Abu Ishaq Ibrahim ibn Abdullah said, Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzaimeh said: "The repetition in the adhan, along with the takbeer and the words of the ikamah, is permissible. It is permissible for the mu'adhin to recite the adhan, then repeat it and recite the ikamah. It is also permissible to recite the adhan and recite the ikamah separately, because both matters were confirmed from the Prophet ﷺ. The sheikh said, The validity of repetition in the words of the ikamah, except for the takbeer and the words of the ikamah, is subject to further consideration. And in the differences of narration, there is an indication that the matter of repetition returned to the words of the ikamah. And regarding the continuity of Abu Mahdhurah and his children in reciting the adhan and reciting the ikamah, which requires the weakness of the narrations of those who narrated their repetition, or it implies that the matter remained as it was with Abu Mahdhurah and his children, and with Saad al-Quradh and his children, in the sanctuary of Allah Almighty and the sanctuary of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, until the change occurred in the days of the Egyptians. And Allah knows best.
لَمَّا خَرَجَ النَّبِيُّ ﷺ إِلَى حُنَيْنٍ فَذَكَرَ الْحَدِيثَ وَقَالَ فِي التَّكْبِيرِ فِي صَدْرِ الْأَذَانِ أَرْبَعًا قَالَ وَعَلَّمَنِي الْإِقَامَةَ مَرَّتَيْنِ اللهُ أَكْبَرُ اللهُ أَكْبَرُ أَشْهَدُ أَنْ لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللهُ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا رَسُولُ اللهِ حِيَّ عَلَى الصَّلَاةِ حِيَّ عَلَى الْفَلَاحِ قَدْ قَامَتِ الصَّلَاةُ قَدْ قَامَتِ الصَّلَاةُ اللهُ أَكْبَرُ اللهُ أَكْبَرُ لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا اللهُ فَذَكَرَ الْإِقَامَةَ مُفْرَدَةً كَمَا تَرَى وَصَارَ قَوْلُهُ مَرَّتَيْنِ عَائِدًا إِلَى كَلِمَةِ الْإِقَامَةِ وَعَلَى ذَلِكَ تَدُلُّ أَيْضًا رِوَايَةُ عَبْدِ الرَّزَّاقِ عَنِ ابْنِ جُرَيْجٍ 1972 أَخْبَرَنَاهُ أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ الْحَافِظُ ثنا أَبُو إِسْحَاقَ إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ ثنا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ بْنِ خُزَيْمَةَ ثنا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ رَافِعٍ ثنا عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ أَخْبَرَنَا ابْنُ جُرَيْجٍ حَدَّثَنِي عُثْمَانُ بْنُ السَّائِبٍ مَوْلَاهُمْ عَنْ أَبِيهِ الشَّيْخِ مَوْلَى أَبِي مَحْذُورَةَ وَعَنْ أُمِّ عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ بْنِ أَبِي مَحْذُورَةَ أَنَّهُمَا سَمِعَا ذَلِكَ مِنْ أَبِي مَحْذُورَةَ فَذَكَرَ الْحَدِيثَ نَحْوَ حَدِيثِ حَجَّاجٍ وَقَالَ فِي آخِرِهِ إِذَا أَقَمْتَ فَقُلْهَا مَرَّتَيْنِ قَدْ قَامَتِ الصَّلَاةُ قَدْ قَامَتِ الصَّلَاةُ أَسَمِعْتَ وَزَادَ فَكَانَ أَبُو مَحْذُورَةَ لَا يُجُزُّ نَاصِيَتَهُ وَلَا يَفْرِقُهَا لِأَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ ﷺ مَسَحَ عَلَيْهَا أَخْبَرَنَا أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ الْحَافِظُ ثنا أَبُو إِسْحَاقَ إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ قَالَ قَالَ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ بْنِ خُزَيْمَةَ التَّرْجِيعُ فِي الْأَذَانِ مَعَ تَثْنِيَةِ الْإِقَامَةِ مِنْ جِنْسِ الِاخْتِلَافِ الْمُبَاحِ فَمُبَاحٌ أَنْ يُؤَذِّنَ الْمُؤَذِّنُ فَيُرَجِّعَ فِي الْأَذَانِ وَيُثَنِّيَ الْإِقَامَةَ وَمُبَاحٌ أَنْ يُثَنِّيَ الْأَذَانَ وَيُفْرِدَ الْإِقَامَةَ إِذْ قَدْ صَحَّ كِلَا الْأَمْرَيْنِ مِنَ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ فَأَمَّا تَثْنِيَةُ الْأَذَانِ وَالْإِقَامَةِ فَلَمْ يَثْبُتْ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ الْأَمْرَ بِهِمَا قَالَ الشَّيْخُ وَفِي صِحَّةِ التَّثْنِيَةِ فِي كَلِمَاتِ الْإِقَامَةِ سِوَى التَّكْبِيرِ وَكَلِمَتَيِ الْإِقَامَةِ نَظَرٌ فَفِي اخْتِلَافِ الرِّوَايَاتِ مَا يُوهِمُ أَنْ يَكُونَ الْأَمْرُ بِالتَّثْنِيَةِ عَادَ إِلَى كَلِمَتَيِ الْإِقَامَةِ وَفِي دَوَامِ أَبِي مَحْذُورَةَ وَأَوْلَادِهِ عَلَى تَرْجِيعِ الْأَذَانِ وَإِفْرَادِ الْإِقَامَةِ مَا يُوجِبُ ضَعْفَ رِوَايَةِ مَنْ رَوَى تَثْنِيَتَهُمَا أَوْ يَقْتَضِي أَنَّ الْأَمْرَ صَارَ إِلَى مَا بَقِيَ عَلَيْهِ هُوَ وَأَوْلَادُهُ وَسَعْدُ الْقَرَظُ وَأَوْلَادُهُ فِي حَرَمِ اللهِ تَعَالَى وَحَرَمِ رَسُولِ اللهِ ﷺ إِلَى أَنْ وَقَعَ التَّغَيُّرُ فِي أَيَّامِ الْمِصْرِيِّينَ وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ