[Machine] That two-thirds of the debt should be borne by the first party, one-third of it on the second party, and one-third on the third party. Because if he died as a result of his own action and the action of two others, then two-thirds of the debt falls on his own action and the two-thirds become obligatory on the second party. In the second situation, two-thirds of the debt are divided into one-third on the first party and one-third on the third party. In the third situation, there are two possibilities: one is that half of the debt falls on the second party and the other is that two-thirds of the debt fall on the first and the second parties. In the fourth situation, the entire debt falls on the third party, and there is another possibility that it falls on the first, second, and third parties. If the hadith is authentic, then the analogy is left to it. And Allah knows best.  

أَنْ يَكُونَ فِي الْأَوَّلِ ثُلُثَا الدِّيَةِ ثُلُثُهَا عَلَى عَاقِلَةِ الثَّانِي وَثُلُثُهَا عَلَى عَاقِلَةِ الثَّالِثِ؛ لِأَنَّهُ مَاتَ مِنْ فِعْلِ نَفْسِهِ وَفِعْلِ اثْنَيْنِ فَسَقَطَ ثُلُثُ الدِّيَةِ لِفِعْلِ نَفْسِهِ وَوَجَبَ الثُّلُثَانِ وَفِي الثَّانِي ثُلُثَا الدِّيَةِ ثُلُثُهَا عَلَى عَاقِلَةِ الْأَوَّلِ وَثُلُثُهَا عَلَى عَاقِلَةِ الثَّالِثِ وَفِي الثَّالِثِ وَجْهَانِ أَحَدُهُمَا نِصْفُ الدِّيَةِ عَلَى عَاقِلَةِ الثَّانِي وَالْآخَرُ ثُلُثَا الدِّيَةِ عَلَى عَاقِلَةِ الْأَوَّلِ وَالثَّانِي وَفِي الرَّابِعِ جَمِيعُ الدِّيَةِ عَلَى عَاقِلَةِ الثَّالِثِ وَفِيهِ وَجْهٌ آخَرُ أَنَّهَا عَلَى عَاقِلَةِ الْأَوَّلِ وَالثَّانِي وَالثَّالِثِ فَإِنْ صَحَّ الْحَدِيثُ تُرِكَ لَهُ الْقِيَاسُ وَاللهُ أَعْلَمُ