[Machine] "That this evidence is valid and can be used as a basis, but it is problematic for us to rely on the narration of Busrah bint Safwan about the Prophet ﷺ , as well as Uthman and Aisha, who are not well-known in their respective cities. How can it be acceptable for someone to confirm the authenticity of an unknown weak source and weaken a known strong source? The sheikh said, and it was narrated by Al-Hajjaj ibn Artat from Aisha bint Ajrad, and Al-Hajjaj ibn Artat is not a reliable narrator."  

أَنَّ هَذَا الْأَثَرَ ثَابِتٌ يُتْرَكُ لَهُ الْقِيَاسُ وَهُوَ يَعِيبُ عَلَيْنَا أَنْ نَأْخُذَ بِحَدِيثِ بُسْرَةَ بِنْتِ صَفْوَانَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ ﷺ وَعُثْمَانُ وَعَائِشَةُ غَيْرُ مَعْرُوفَيْنِ بِبَلَدِهِمَا وَكَيْفَ يَجُوزُ لِأَحَدٍ أَنْ يُثَبِّتَ ضَعِيفًا مَجْهُولًا وَيُوَهِّنَ قَوِيًّا مَعْرُوفًا قَالَ الشَّيْخُ وَرَوَاهُ الْحَجَّاجُ بْنُ أَرْطَاةَ عَنْ عَائِشَةَ بِنْتِ عَجْرَدٍ وَالْحَجَّاجُ بْنُ أَرْطَاةَ لَيْسَ بِحُجَّةٍ