[Machine] A man testified in front of the imam and the imam confirmed his testimony. Then, he was called to give another testimony. Is his first testimony valid or his second? He said, "He has no testimony in the first or the second." The sheikh said, "This is regarding the reversed ruling before the verdict of the first."
عَنْ رَجُلٍ شَهِدَ عِنْدَ الْإِمَامِ فَأَثْبَتَ الْإِمَامُ شَهَادَتَهُ ثُمَّ دُعِيَ لَهَا فَبَدَّلَهَا أَتَجُوزُ شَهَادَتُهُ الْأُولَى أَوِ الْآخِرَةُ؟ قَالَ لَا شَهَادَةَ لَهُ فِي الْأُولَى وَلَا فِي الْآخِرَةِ قَالَ الشَّيْخُ وَهَذَا فِي الرُّجُوعِ قَبْلَ إِمْضَاءِ الْحُكْمِ بِالْأُولَى
Add your own reflection below:
Sign in with Google to add or reply to reflections.